I just read “Consider the Lobster,” this article thing David Foster Wallace wrote about the Maine Lobster Festival. It basically starts with him and his parents and girlfriend at this festival, eating their lobster, and it ends with these really intense ethical questions about whether it’s moral to boil lobsters alive. Maybe they can feel pain! They try to climb out of the pot when you boil them! But then, what does “pain” really mean? What does “pot” really mean? What is the True Nature of Suffering?
It’s sort of not supposed to be funny–I mean, maybe sporadically, but I doubt he’d be thrilled if you texted him like, “Hey man, read your lobster thang. LOL!”–but I couldn’t stop laughing because I kept thinking about how weird it probably was for his girlfriend to read. Or maybe how weird it would be for me if I went on a date with a dude to a lobster festival and then he wrote “Consider the Lobster” (because DFDub’s GF was probably used to him).
Think about it! You go to a lobster festival with your boo. He’s writing an article about it, but for you it’s just a vacation. So you eat a bunch of lobster. You stroll around. The sun is shining. The birds are chirping. The lobsters are dying in droves, but that’s probably not your main focus. You hang out on the beach. You’re with his parents, which maybe is a big deal. You leave thinking you all had a nice, relaxing time.
Then a couple weeks later, you read the article he wrote about your vacay, which includes the sentence “There happen to be two main criteria that most ethicists agree on for determining whether a living creature has the capacity to suffer and so has genuine interests that it may or may not be our moral duty to consider.”
And you’re like, my god! I thought me and Dave had a good time at the lobster festival!
Posted by mae1023